Cstar Spy-Scope 8×20 Monocular - Gadget Box

A question of titles: 1, you have onhand.

but to implement the “optical” When I travel (tourism), when I entered the sites for bird watching and wild (out), I would have been to me when I go to a number of tactical optics (as I separated the two rifles, or professional, such as night vision goggles). After messing with the design, magnification, size, weight about, and additional features such as lens coatings, I finally decided that the most practical effect on body weight vs. size ratio is 21 or 8 × 8 × 20 monocular compact design. For me, this is the perfect balance between practicality, cost and portability / ease of deployment. . . After all, you may have the best of 1000 U.S. dollars Zeiss optics in the world, but if the protection of sitting in this case deep in your backpack. . . Ah, it is not the band ‘What do you good. So, for me. All around me were beautiful (read: costly) the scope and location of the telescope for many years, dutifully packed away in my bag, or my bag outside of the pocket, or in one of my holster, or Second, as this huge band. 5 pounds anchor around my neck. But what I really want is the ability to quickly brought closer, clearer vision of things (birds, landscape features, points of interest mainly to confirm). In fact, sometimes this is it for a sign when I sail. I want the real size by more downsizing for years, finally, I ended 8 × 20 is the most practical solution for my monocular.
As I said at the access of small bags in my packstrap monocular
, I could whip out my 3 seconds as the optical and in any object caught my eye focus, and My friend is still digging around their binoculars in the package, or more often, not even bother to take the trouble. And soon, I can put it back in its case, and hiking. I will tell you that this is to propose a different world to me. . . . Look at things more closely, casual, convenient and quick.

It is true that monocular vision is limited. It is not large enough (diameter) pulled in a lot of light, so forget low light or night viewing (this is not to say I did not enjoy some star gazing, or looking for the moon with this scope). And, as already noted, it is not the best, or even focus on ergonomic design does not practice (). But, for me, it’s functional, practical design and decent price make it a device, I am not very worried about damage. As a matter of fact, I have three and I have only destroyed one (so far), and parted to repair it.

There are many good single-lens reflex designs there. All I am saying is, I this one works. . . . Cheap, practical and functional.
Rating: 4 / 5